<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternative measures to the AUC for rare-event prognostic models</title>
	<link>http://blog.markus-breitenbach.com/2010/02/16/alternative-measures-to-the-auc-for-rare-event-prognostic-models/</link>
	<description>AI, Data Mining, Machine Learning and other things</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://blog.markus-breitenbach.com/2010/02/16/alternative-measures-to-the-auc-for-rare-event-prognostic-models/#comment-26753</link>
		<author>Markus</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.markus-breitenbach.com/2010/02/16/alternative-measures-to-the-auc-for-rare-event-prognostic-models/#comment-26753</guid>
		<description>The x-axis is just the score-value. The plot is supposed to show that the two classes overlap and can not be perfectly separated by the classifier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The x-axis is just the score-value. The plot is supposed to show that the two classes overlap and can not be perfectly separated by the classifier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steffen</title>
		<link>http://blog.markus-breitenbach.com/2010/02/16/alternative-measures-to-the-auc-for-rare-event-prognostic-models/#comment-26744</link>
		<author>steffen</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.markus-breitenbach.com/2010/02/16/alternative-measures-to-the-auc-for-rare-event-prognostic-models/#comment-26744</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this case study (including your thoughts). I have messed around with AUC and the Calibration-Refinement / Sharpness - measures also.

A conclusion from various papers was, that Logistic Regression in general delivers well calibrated probabilities. Hence it was interesting to see the opposite can happen when only a small base rate is given.

Side Note A: I did not understand the risk-score density plot. What is the x-axis ? 

Side Note B: http://home.comcast.net/~tom.fawcett/public_html/papers/ROC101.pdf is an excellent study of roc and auc in general. 

thanks again for this post. Blogs with technical and detailed data mining content are hard to find.

Steffen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this case study (including your thoughts). I have messed around with AUC and the Calibration-Refinement / Sharpness - measures also.</p>
<p>A conclusion from various papers was, that Logistic Regression in general delivers well calibrated probabilities. Hence it was interesting to see the opposite can happen when only a small base rate is given.</p>
<p>Side Note A: I did not understand the risk-score density plot. What is the x-axis ? </p>
<p>Side Note B: <a href="http://home.comcast.net/~tom.fawcett/public_html/papers/ROC101.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://home.comcast.net/~tom.fawcett/public_html/papers/ROC101.pdf</a> is an excellent study of roc and auc in general. </p>
<p>thanks again for this post. Blogs with technical and detailed data mining content are hard to find.</p>
<p>Steffen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

