Info
You are currently browsing the Markus Breitenbach weblog archives for the day March 1, 2009 5:18 pm.
Categories
- Advertising (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) (13)
- Classification (3)
- Clustering (1)
- Coding / Programming (8)
- Cryptography (1)
- Data Mining (19)
- Economy / Investing (1)
- ewrt linux (2)
- Fixing Stuff (8)
- Machine Learning (30)
- Math (2)
- Politics (3)
- Predictive Modeling (4)
- Psychology (3)
- Ramblings (26)
- Random (9)
- Security (15)
- Society (12)
- Sociology (4)
- spam (3)
- Statistics (15)
Latest Postings
- July 11, 2010 8:56 pm: GraphLab & Parallel Machine Learning
- June 15, 2010 8:21 pm: PHP configuration using htaccess on 1and1 shared hosting
- February 28, 2010 12:21 pm: Energy efficient data mining algorithms
- February 16, 2010 11:56 pm: Alternative measures to the AUC for rare-event prognostic models
- January 26, 2010 9:54 pm: Spam Filtering by Learning a Pattern Language
- January 10, 2010 5:37 pm: Strong profiling is not mathematically optimal for discovering rare malfeasors (on rare event detection)
- November 13, 2009 12:27 am: Starcraft AI competition
- July 25, 2009 8:34 pm: Random characters in text mode -> graphics card
- June 7, 2009 5:04 pm: Programs stealing the input focus
- May 2, 2009 4:06 pm: Famous bugs in AI game engine caught on tape
Links
Blogroll
Uncategorized
Useful Links
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Archive for March 1, 2009 5:18 pm
Torpedo-Reviews in Machine Learning Conferences
March 1, 2009 5:18 pm by Markus.
Interesting post over at hunch.net about reviewers bidding for papers in order to shoot them down. Make sure to read the comments… That state of mind of some reviewers might explain why the least-informative and most negative reviews always come with the highest confidence rating in ML conferences (specifically NIPS).
Posted in Machine Learning | Print | 2 Comments »
|